{"jobs":[{"id":"eef73fe6-fe5f-4949-a0f7-a21853eb4179","title":"Senior Engineer","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2025-12-02T18:17:55.444+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/eef73fe6-fe5f-4949-a0f7-a21853eb4179","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/eef73fe6-fe5f-4949-a0f7-a21853eb4179/application","descriptionHtml":"<h2>Loom Overview<br />Watch this <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"http://loom.com/share/fe621cd1991e4c0fa21cac591caab141\"><strong>loom video</strong></a><strong> </strong>from our <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://x.com/gabe_g2i?lang=en\"><strong>CEO, Gabe Greenberg,</strong></a> for more details about the role!</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Role Overview</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">At G2i, we don’t just hire for AI — we build with it. We’re partnering with leading AI labs and technical founders to create next-generation developer platforms, data tools, and operational dashboards that power the AI frontier.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">As a <strong>Full-Stack Developer</strong>, you’ll architect and build the systems that make this innovation possible — fast, scalable, and elegant. Using <strong>React 19, Node.js</strong>, you’ll deliver products that balance cutting-edge technology with developer-focused precision.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Key Responsibilities</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design, develop, and maintain full-stack web applications using <strong>React 19</strong>, and <strong>Node.js</strong>.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Implement <strong>tRPC APIs</strong> and ensure type-safe, end-to-end communication across services.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Containerize and deploy applications using <strong>Docker</strong>, ensuring smooth CI/CD pipelines.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Collaborate with designers and other engineers to ship performant, scalable features quickly.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Maintain high code quality, test coverage, and documentation standards.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Ideal Qualifications</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>5+ years</strong> of professional full-stack experience (or equivalent).</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Proven experience in <strong>React 19</strong>, <strong>Node.js</strong>, </p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Hands-on experience with <strong>Docker</strong> and cloud-based deployment workflows.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Startup experience — you’re fast-moving, pragmatic, and adaptable.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong understanding of modern front-end patterns, server-side rendering, and performance optimization.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Compensation &amp; Terms</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>50 - 150USD/Hr</strong> based on experience and location.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Contract</strong> roles available, up to 6 months</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Remote-first, global team.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Application Process</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ol style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Resume submission.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Technical challenge.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Behavioral test.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Offer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ol><h2>About G2i</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">G2i helps startups hire senior engineers faster and smarter through video-based technical evaluation. We’ve placed thousands of developers worldwide since 2016 and built a community rooted in <strong>Quality, Urgency, and Agility</strong>.</p>","descriptionPlain":"LOOM OVERVIEW\nWATCH THIS LOOM VIDEO http://loom.com/share/fe621cd1991e4c0fa21cac591caab141 FROM OUR CEO, GABE GREENBERG, https://x.com/gabe_g2i?lang=en FOR MORE DETAILS ABOUT THE ROLE!\n\n\n\n\nROLE OVERVIEW\n\n\n\nAt G2i, we don’t just hire for AI — we build with it. We’re partnering with leading AI labs and technical founders to create next-generation developer platforms, data tools, and operational dashboards that power the AI frontier.\n\nAs a Full-Stack Developer, you’ll architect and build the systems that make this innovation possible — fast, scalable, and elegant. Using React 19, Node.js, you’ll deliver products that balance cutting-edge technology with developer-focused precision.\n\n\n\n\nKEY RESPONSIBILITIES\n\n\n\n - Design, develop, and maintain full-stack web applications using React 19, and Node.js.\n\n - Implement tRPC APIs and ensure type-safe, end-to-end communication across services.\n\n - Containerize and deploy applications using Docker, ensuring smooth CI/CD pipelines.\n\n - Collaborate with designers and other engineers to ship performant, scalable features quickly.\n\n - Maintain high code quality, test coverage, and documentation standards.\n   \n   \n\n\nIDEAL QUALIFICATIONS\n\n\n\n - 5+ years of professional full-stack experience (or equivalent).\n\n - Proven experience in React 19, Node.js, \n\n - Hands-on experience with Docker and cloud-based deployment workflows.\n\n - Startup experience — you’re fast-moving, pragmatic, and adaptable.\n\n - Strong understanding of modern front-end patterns, server-side rendering, and performance optimization.\n   \n   \n\n\nCOMPENSATION & TERMS\n\n\n\n - 50 - 150USD/Hr based on experience and location.\n\n - Contract roles available, up to 6 months\n\n - Remote-first, global team.\n   \n   \n\n\nAPPLICATION PROCESS\n\n\n\n 1. Resume submission.\n\n 2. Technical challenge.\n\n 3. Behavioral test.\n\n 4. Offer.\n    \n    \n\n\nABOUT G2I\n\n\n\nG2i helps startups hire senior engineers faster and smarter through video-based technical evaluation. We’ve placed thousands of developers worldwide since 2016 and built a community rooted in Quality, Urgency, and Agility.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"d84ceb74-f16f-4124-b400-6168dcfef477","title":"Staff Engineer","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2025-12-02T18:53:36.615+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/d84ceb74-f16f-4124-b400-6168dcfef477","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/d84ceb74-f16f-4124-b400-6168dcfef477/application","descriptionHtml":"<h2>Loom Overview<br />Watch this <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"http://loom.com/share/fe621cd1991e4c0fa21cac591caab141\"><strong>loom video</strong></a><strong> </strong>from our <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://x.com/gabe_g2i?lang=en\"><strong>CEO, Gabe Greenberg,</strong></a> for more details about the role!</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Role Overview</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">At G2i, we don’t just hire for AI — we build with it. We partner with leading AI labs and technical founders to create next-generation developer platforms, data tools, and operational dashboards that power the AI frontier.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">As a <strong>Staff Engineer</strong>, you’ll set technical direction and raise the execution bar while building a high-performing team. You’ll guide architecture and delivery across modern full-stack systems (React 19 + Node.js), build durable engineering practices, and ensure we ship fast without sacrificing quality.</p><h2></h2><h2>Key Responsibilities</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Lead and grow an engineering team: hiring, coaching, performance management, career development.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Set and evolve technical strategy for <strong>developer platforms, dashboards, and internal tooling</strong>.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Partner with Product/Design to deliver roadmap outcomes with high velocity and strong craftsmanship.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Establish engineering standards: code quality, testing, documentation, security, and operational excellence.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Own delivery health: sprint/iteration hygiene, predictable execution, and strong on-call/incident practices.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Drive architecture decisions across front-end, back-end (tRPC encouraged), and deployment (Docker + CI/CD).</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build a culture of ownership, feedback, and continuous improvement across teams.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Ideal Qualifications</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">7+ years building software, including 2–4+ years leading teams (EM/Tech Lead/Head of Eng).</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong full-stack understanding (React + Node.js), modern front-end patterns, SSR/performance, API design.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with shipping and operating production systems (cloud, CI/CD, observability, incident management).</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Proven ability to balance speed with quality in startup environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Clear communicator with strong judgment and a track record of developing engineers.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Compensation &amp; Terms</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>120 – 200USD/Hr</strong>, based on experience and location</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract leadership roles considered (up to 6 months)</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Remote-first, global team</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p></li></ul><h2>Application Process</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Resume submission → Leadership/technical screen → → Behavioral interview → Offer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>About G2i</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">G2i helps startups hire senior engineers faster and smarter through video-based technical evaluation. We’ve placed thousands of developers worldwide since 2016 and built a community rooted in <strong>Quality, Urgency, and Agility</strong>.</p>","descriptionPlain":"LOOM OVERVIEW\nWATCH THIS LOOM VIDEO http://loom.com/share/fe621cd1991e4c0fa21cac591caab141 FROM OUR CEO, GABE GREENBERG, https://x.com/gabe_g2i?lang=en FOR MORE DETAILS ABOUT THE ROLE!\n\n\n\n\nROLE OVERVIEW\n\n\n\nAt G2i, we don’t just hire for AI — we build with it. We partner with leading AI labs and technical founders to create next-generation developer platforms, data tools, and operational dashboards that power the AI frontier.\n\nAs a Staff Engineer, you’ll set technical direction and raise the execution bar while building a high-performing team. You’ll guide architecture and delivery across modern full-stack systems (React 19 + Node.js), build durable engineering practices, and ensure we ship fast without sacrificing quality.\n\n\n\n\n\nKEY RESPONSIBILITIES\n\n\n\n - Lead and grow an engineering team: hiring, coaching, performance management, career development.\n\n - Set and evolve technical strategy for developer platforms, dashboards, and internal tooling.\n\n - Partner with Product/Design to deliver roadmap outcomes with high velocity and strong craftsmanship.\n\n - Establish engineering standards: code quality, testing, documentation, security, and operational excellence.\n\n - Own delivery health: sprint/iteration hygiene, predictable execution, and strong on-call/incident practices.\n\n - Drive architecture decisions across front-end, back-end (tRPC encouraged), and deployment (Docker + CI/CD).\n\n - Build a culture of ownership, feedback, and continuous improvement across teams.\n   \n   \n\n\nIDEAL QUALIFICATIONS\n\n\n\n - 7+ years building software, including 2–4+ years leading teams (EM/Tech Lead/Head of Eng).\n\n - Strong full-stack understanding (React + Node.js), modern front-end patterns, SSR/performance, API design.\n\n - Experience with shipping and operating production systems (cloud, CI/CD, observability, incident management).\n\n - Proven ability to balance speed with quality in startup environments.\n\n - Clear communicator with strong judgment and a track record of developing engineers.\n   \n   \n\n\nCOMPENSATION & TERMS\n\n\n\n - 120 – 200USD/Hr, based on experience and location\n\n - Contract leadership roles considered (up to 6 months)\n\n - Remote-first, global team\n   \n   \n\n\nAPPLICATION PROCESS\n\n\n\nResume submission → Leadership/technical screen → → Behavioral interview → Offer\n\n\n\n\nABOUT G2I\n\n\n\nG2i helps startups hire senior engineers faster and smarter through video-based technical evaluation. We’ve placed thousands of developers worldwide since 2016 and built a community rooted in Quality, Urgency, and Agility.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"81872f0a-4551-40c6-896b-4821e41d24f8","title":"DevOps Engineer","department":"On-demand (contracts)","team":"On-demand (contracts)","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T18:14:10.648+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/81872f0a-4551-40c6-896b-4821e41d24f8","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/81872f0a-4551-40c6-896b-4821e41d24f8/application","descriptionHtml":"<h1>DevOps Engineer — Mobile &amp; Web (React Native / Expo)</h1><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>Location:</strong> Fully remote — candidates worldwide<br /><strong>Engagement:</strong> Long-term contract</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Budget: </strong>up to 46 USD per hour</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>About our Client</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client is a software startup making sports training more engaging through gamification. Our platform connects training facilities, commercially available sensor systems, and players through mobile apps and the web, turning practice into a social and competitive experience.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>About the role</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We’re looking for a hands-on DevOps Engineer to own and improve our mobile and web build, release, and deployment workflows.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You’ll work with GitHub Actions, Expo, EAS, React Native, Supabase, Next.js, and React to help a small, fully remote engineering team ship reliable updates. Alongside release engineering, you’ll troubleshoot React Native issues, fix bugs, and contribute UI updates when needed.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>What you’ll do</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Manage, maintain, and optimize CI/CD pipelines, build systems, and deployment workflows for mobile and web applications.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build and improve GitHub Actions workflows, including automated testing and release checks.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Manage iOS and Android builds and releases using Expo/EAS, App Store Connect, and Google Play Console.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Configure and manage over-the-air updates, versioning strategies, and release environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Support A/B testing frameworks and automated testing integrations.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Improve developer tooling, Supabase services, and infrastructure supporting Next.js and React applications.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Troubleshoot build and deployment failures and resolve React Native bugs and UI issues.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Take ownership of practical engineering tasks as priorities evolve.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>What we’re looking for</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">3+ years of experience in DevOps or infrastructure engineering focused on mobile and web platforms.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong hands-on experience with GitHub Actions, Expo, EAS, and React Native.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Proven experience managing production releases through both App Store Connect and Google Play Console.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience configuring versioning strategies, OTA updates, and A/B testing environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Proficiency with Supabase and the Next.js and React ecosystems.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ability to make React Native code changes, including bug fixes and UI updates.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong troubleshooting skills, ownership, and the ability to manage changing priorities in a small startup team.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>Nice to have</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience supporting automated end-to-end and integration tests in CI/CD.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience implementing 3D graphics in mobile applications outside gaming.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience developing for hardware sensors or integrating sensor data.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Meaningful engineering ownership of shipped cross-platform products.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Interest in product design, user experience, and software quality.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A love of baseball or other sports, particularly skills training.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>Why join?</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work on a sports training platform connecting software with real-world practice.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Own mobile and web delivery workflows with a direct impact on the product and developer experience.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Join a small, fully remote team in a long-term contracting role.</p></li></ul>","descriptionPlain":"DEVOPS ENGINEER — MOBILE & WEB (REACT NATIVE / EXPO)\n\n\nLocation: Fully remote — candidates worldwide\nEngagement: Long-term contract\n\nBudget: up to 46 USD per hour\n\n\n\n\nABOUT OUR CLIENT\n\nOur client is a software startup making sports training more engaging through gamification. Our platform connects training facilities, commercially available sensor systems, and players through mobile apps and the web, turning practice into a social and competitive experience.\n\n\n\n\nABOUT THE ROLE\n\nWe’re looking for a hands-on DevOps Engineer to own and improve our mobile and web build, release, and deployment workflows.\n\nYou’ll work with GitHub Actions, Expo, EAS, React Native, Supabase, Next.js, and React to help a small, fully remote engineering team ship reliable updates. Alongside release engineering, you’ll troubleshoot React Native issues, fix bugs, and contribute UI updates when needed.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Manage, maintain, and optimize CI/CD pipelines, build systems, and deployment workflows for mobile and web applications.\n\n - Build and improve GitHub Actions workflows, including automated testing and release checks.\n\n - Manage iOS and Android builds and releases using Expo/EAS, App Store Connect, and Google Play Console.\n\n - Configure and manage over-the-air updates, versioning strategies, and release environments.\n\n - Support A/B testing frameworks and automated testing integrations.\n\n - Improve developer tooling, Supabase services, and infrastructure supporting Next.js and React applications.\n\n - Troubleshoot build and deployment failures and resolve React Native bugs and UI issues.\n\n - Take ownership of practical engineering tasks as priorities evolve.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR\n\n - 3+ years of experience in DevOps or infrastructure engineering focused on mobile and web platforms.\n\n - Strong hands-on experience with GitHub Actions, Expo, EAS, and React Native.\n\n - Proven experience managing production releases through both App Store Connect and Google Play Console.\n\n - Experience configuring versioning strategies, OTA updates, and A/B testing environments.\n\n - Proficiency with Supabase and the Next.js and React ecosystems.\n\n - Ability to make React Native code changes, including bug fixes and UI updates.\n\n - Strong troubleshooting skills, ownership, and the ability to manage changing priorities in a small startup team.\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n - Experience supporting automated end-to-end and integration tests in CI/CD.\n\n - Experience implementing 3D graphics in mobile applications outside gaming.\n\n - Experience developing for hardware sensors or integrating sensor data.\n\n - Meaningful engineering ownership of shipped cross-platform products.\n\n - Interest in product design, user experience, and software quality.\n\n - A love of baseball or other sports, particularly skills training.\n\n\n\n\nWHY JOIN?\n\n - Work on a sports training platform connecting software with real-world practice.\n\n - Own mobile and web delivery workflows with a direct impact on the product and developer experience.\n\n - Join a small, fully remote team in a long-term contracting role.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"6ea6a53a-7689-45f2-b429-1146965d3cd7","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - United States","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"New York City","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[{"location":"Connecticut","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Connecticut","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Hartford"}}},{"location":"Memphis","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Tennessee","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Memphis"}}},{"location":"Sacramento","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Sacramento"}}},{"location":"Mississauga","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ontario","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Mississauga"}}},{"location":"Maryland","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Maryland","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Baltimore"}}},{"location":"Boston","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Massachuetts","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Boston"}}},{"location":"San Francisco","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"San Francisco"}}},{"location":"Denver","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Colorado","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Denver"}}},{"location":"Minnesota","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Minnesota","streetAddress":"","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Minneapolis"}}},{"location":"Oklahoma City","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Oklahoma","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Oklahoma City"}}},{"location":"Utah","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Utah","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Salt Lake City"}}},{"location":"Nashville","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Tennessee","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Nashville"}}},{"location":"Wisconsin","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Wisconsin","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Milwaukee"}}},{"location":"Indianapolis","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Indiana","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Indianapolis"}}},{"location":"Chicago","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Illinois","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Chicago"}}},{"location":"Charlotte","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"North Carolina","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Charlotte"}}},{"location":"Seattle","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Washington","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Seattle"}}},{"location":"Chesapeake","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Chesapeake"}}},{"location":"Atlanta","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Georgia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Atlanta"}}},{"location":"Miami","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Florida","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Miami"}}},{"location":"Pittsburgh","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Pennsylvania","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Pittsburgh"}}},{"location":"Cleveland","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ohio","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Cleveland"}}},{"location":"San Jose","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"San Jose"}}},{"location":"Phoenix","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Arizona","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Phoenix"}}},{"location":"Michigan","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Michigan","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Detroit"}}},{"location":"Oregon","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Oregon","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Portland"}}},{"location":"Austin","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Texas","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Austin"}}},{"location":"Riverside","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Riverside"}}},{"location":"Cincinnati","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ohio","streetAddress":"","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Cincinnati"}}},{"location":"Orlando","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Florida","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Orlando"}}},{"location":"Norfolk","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Norfolk"}}},{"location":"Dallas","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Texas","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Dallas"}}},{"location":"Missouri","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Missouri","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"St. Louis"}}},{"location":"Virginia Beach","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Virginia Beach"}}},{"location":"San Antonio","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Texas","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"San Antonio"}}},{"location":"Philadelphia","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Pennsylvania","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Philadelphia"}}},{"location":"Arlington","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Arlington"}}},{"location":"Kentucky","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Kentucky","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Louisville"}}},{"location":"Richmond","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Richmond"}}},{"location":"Raleigh","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"North Carolina","streetAddress":"","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Raleigh"}}},{"location":"Buffalo","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"New York","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Buffalo"}}},{"location":"Savannah","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Georgia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Savannah"}}},{"location":"Columbus","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ohio","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Columbus"}}},{"location":"Las Vegas","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Nevada","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Las Vegas"}}},{"location":"Alabama","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Alabama","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Birmingham"}}},{"location":"Los Angeles","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Los Angeles"}}},{"location":"Boise","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Idaho","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Boise"}}},{"location":"Fairfax","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Virginia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Fairfax"}}},{"location":"Fort Worth","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Texas","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Fort Worth"}}},{"location":"Jacksonville","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Florida","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Jacksonville"}}},{"location":"Tampa","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Florida","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Tampa"}}},{"location":"Rhode Island","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Rhode Island","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Providence"}}},{"location":"El Paso","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Texas","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"El Paso"}}},{"location":"San Diego","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"California","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"San Diego"}}},{"location":"Tucson","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Arizona","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Tucson"}}},{"location":"Reno","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Nevada","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Reno"}}},{"location":"Washington, D.C.","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"District of Columbia","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"Washington, D.C."}}}],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:48:53.224+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"New York","addressCountry":"United States","addressLocality":"New York City"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/6ea6a53a-7689-45f2-b429-1146965d3cd7","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/6ea6a53a-7689-45f2-b429-1146965d3cd7/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"54c96082-bb99-41b0-ba00-3e0551c20708","title":"DevOps Engineer","department":"Direct&Permanent Hires","team":"Direct&Permanent Hires","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"USA","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-01T12:40:11.903+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/54c96082-bb99-41b0-ba00-3e0551c20708","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/54c96082-bb99-41b0-ba00-3e0551c20708/application","descriptionHtml":"<h1>Senior DevOps Engineer – FedRAMP</h1><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Location:</strong> East Coast, United States — Remote<br /><strong>Employment Type:</strong> Full-time<br /><strong>Annual Salary:</strong> $170,000–$200,000<br /><strong>Eligibility:</strong> U.S. citizenship required due to FedRAMP requirements</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Big Ideas. Real People.</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">At our client, they believe that in the right environment and with the right team, talent has no boundaries. This team spirit, together with our drive to always aim high, has quickly earned us unicorn status and established Orca as a global cloud security innovation leader.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We’re looking for driven and talented people to join our mission to change the future of cloud security. If you’re ready to join a global team that inspires and challenges each other every day, now is the time to find your place in our pod.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Why our Client?</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>High growth:</strong> Over the past seven years, Orca has consistently achieved milestones that take other companies a decade or more. We have significantly expanded our team, customer reach, and product capabilities.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Disruptive innovation:</strong> Orca’s founders recognized that traditional security approaches were not built for the cloud. They pioneered agentless cloud security technology and continue to advance one of the industry’s most comprehensive cloud security platforms.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Well-capitalized:</strong> With a valuation of $1.8 billion, Orca is a cybersecurity unicorn backed by investors including CapitalG, ICONIQ, GGV, and SVCI.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Respectful and transparent culture:</strong> Our executives pride themselves on being accessible and openly sharing knowledge. Every employee has an opportunity to help shape the company and the future of cloud security.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>About the Role</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client is looking for a hands-on Senior DevOps Engineer to build, operate, monitor, and continuously improve the infrastructure supporting our U.S. federal and FedRAMP environments.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will work with public-cloud infrastructure, production Kubernetes environments, infrastructure as code, CI/CD systems, observability, and security automation. You will also help ensure that Orca’s GovCloud and other relevant environments remain secure, reliable, scalable, and compliant.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is one of a small number of U.S.-based engineering positions within a global R&amp;D organization. You will work closely with engineering colleagues in Israel and serve as a key technical resource for Orca’s U.S. infrastructure.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The right candidate is a hands-on engineer who can build infrastructure from scratch, independently debug complex production incidents, make sound architectural decisions, and operate effectively in a fast-moving environment.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What You’ll Do</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design and implement solutions that improve new and existing cloud infrastructure.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build, support, and operate infrastructure for FedRAMP-authorized environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ensure the reliable and secure operation of Orca’s AWS GovCloud and other relevant environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build, administer, and troubleshoot production Kubernetes environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Investigate Kubernetes and infrastructure incidents from initial symptoms through root-cause analysis and permanent remediation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Develop reusable infrastructure-as-code components using Terraform.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Use Ansible to automate configuration, deployment, hardening, and operational processes.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build and support development and production environments for Orca’s R&amp;D organization.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design and implement robust CI/CD pipelines.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build monitoring, alerting, and self-healing capabilities.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Improve system observability through log analysis, dashboard development, and automated alerts based on established SLOs and SLAs.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Apply continuous dependency upgrades and remediate vulnerabilities within FedRAMP environments.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Assess infrastructure and deployment procedures to ensure compliance with internal policies and external regulations.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Respond to system and production issues in a timely manner.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Collaborate with engineering, security, and compliance teams when FedRAMP requirements affect infrastructure or operational decisions.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Follow Orca’s policies and procedures related to internal privileged-access rights.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Participate in regular collaboration with Orca’s Israel-based engineering team, including an 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time standup Monday through Thursday.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Who You Are</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You are a U.S. citizen, as required for this FedRAMP environment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You are based on the U.S. East Coast or can consistently work an East Coast schedule.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have at least three years of experience in DevOps, infrastructure, platform, cloud, or site reliability engineering.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have at least two to three years of meaningful, hands-on experience with Kubernetes in production.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have personally built or substantially designed cloud infrastructure using Terraform or comparable infrastructure-as-code tooling.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You understand Terraform modules, state management, environment separation, code review, and CI/CD practices.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have practical experience with Ansible for configuration management and automation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have experience building, operating, or directly supporting infrastructure within a FedRAMP-authorized environment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have strong experience working with public-cloud infrastructure, ideally AWS and AWS GovCloud.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have designed and implemented sophisticated CI/CD pipelines.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have experience with monitoring and observability tools such as Prometheus, Graphite, Grafana, CloudWatch, or similar platforms.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have hands-on experience with Kubernetes and Helm.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have programming experience with Python, Java, or Go, along with scripting experience using Bash or a similar language.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You understand system-level concepts including operating systems, networking, storage, and file-system management.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You can diagnose production problems independently and communicate the root cause, remediation, and preventive actions clearly.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You are self-driven, resourceful, organized, and eager to learn.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have strong analytical and problem-solving abilities.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have excellent written and verbal communication skills.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You hold a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, or equivalent practical experience.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>FedRAMP Experience</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The strongest candidates will have directly participated in a FedRAMP authorization or continuous monitoring program, with experience in areas such as:</p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Operating AWS GovCloud infrastructure.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Implementing or maintaining security controls.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Defining or supporting authorization boundaries.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Resolving POA&amp;M items.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Collecting technical evidence for audits.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Managing continuous monitoring and vulnerability remediation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Working within FIPS requirements.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Supporting recurring audits or working with compliance teams and external assessors.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Candidates may still qualify if they worked hands-on as a DevOps, platform, cloud, or infrastructure engineer within a FedRAMP-compliant organization, even if they did not personally lead the entire authorization process.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">General knowledge of FedRAMP without practical engineering involvement will not be sufficient.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What We Offer</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Competitive salary and equity package.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Discounted medical, dental, and vision benefits with significant employer contributions.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Benefits coverage beginning on your first day of employment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Generous paid time off with U.S. holidays observed.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Flexible remote work environment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Your choice of a Mac or Windows laptop.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work-from-home stipend during your first month of employment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Monthly reimbursement for your cell phone and home internet.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The opportunity to collaborate with talented colleagues around the world.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The annual salary range for this position is <strong>$170,000–$200,000</strong>. This represents the typical range based on experience, skills, and other relevant factors.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This position is open until filled. Applications will be accepted on an ongoing basis.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client is an equal-opportunity employer. Qualified applicants will receive consideration without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender perception or identity, national origin, age, marital status, protected</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">veteran status, disability status, or any other status protected by applicable law.</p>","descriptionPlain":"SENIOR DEVOPS ENGINEER – FEDRAMP\n\nLocation: East Coast, United States — Remote\nEmployment Type: Full-time\nAnnual Salary: $170,000–$200,000\nEligibility: U.S. citizenship required due to FedRAMP requirements\n\n\n\n\nBIG IDEAS. REAL PEOPLE.\n\nAt our client, they believe that in the right environment and with the right team, talent has no boundaries. This team spirit, together with our drive to always aim high, has quickly earned us unicorn status and established Orca as a global cloud security innovation leader.\n\nWe’re looking for driven and talented people to join our mission to change the future of cloud security. If you’re ready to join a global team that inspires and challenges each other every day, now is the time to find your place in our pod.\n\n\n\n\nWHY OUR CLIENT?\n\n - High growth: Over the past seven years, Orca has consistently achieved milestones that take other companies a decade or more. We have significantly expanded our team, customer reach, and product capabilities.\n\n - Disruptive innovation: Orca’s founders recognized that traditional security approaches were not built for the cloud. They pioneered agentless cloud security technology and continue to advance one of the industry’s most comprehensive cloud security platforms.\n\n - Well-capitalized: With a valuation of $1.8 billion, Orca is a cybersecurity unicorn backed by investors including CapitalG, ICONIQ, GGV, and SVCI.\n\n - Respectful and transparent culture: Our executives pride themselves on being accessible and openly sharing knowledge. Every employee has an opportunity to help shape the company and the future of cloud security.\n\n\n\n\nABOUT THE ROLE\n\nOur client is looking for a hands-on Senior DevOps Engineer to build, operate, monitor, and continuously improve the infrastructure supporting our U.S. federal and FedRAMP environments.\n\nYou will work with public-cloud infrastructure, production Kubernetes environments, infrastructure as code, CI/CD systems, observability, and security automation. You will also help ensure that Orca’s GovCloud and other relevant environments remain secure, reliable, scalable, and compliant.\n\nThis is one of a small number of U.S.-based engineering positions within a global R&D organization. You will work closely with engineering colleagues in Israel and serve as a key technical resource for Orca’s U.S. infrastructure.\n\nThe right candidate is a hands-on engineer who can build infrastructure from scratch, independently debug complex production incidents, make sound architectural decisions, and operate effectively in a fast-moving environment.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Design and implement solutions that improve new and existing cloud infrastructure.\n\n - Build, support, and operate infrastructure for FedRAMP-authorized environments.\n\n - Ensure the reliable and secure operation of Orca’s AWS GovCloud and other relevant environments.\n\n - Build, administer, and troubleshoot production Kubernetes environments.\n\n - Investigate Kubernetes and infrastructure incidents from initial symptoms through root-cause analysis and permanent remediation.\n\n - Develop reusable infrastructure-as-code components using Terraform.\n\n - Use Ansible to automate configuration, deployment, hardening, and operational processes.\n\n - Build and support development and production environments for Orca’s R&D organization.\n\n - Design and implement robust CI/CD pipelines.\n\n - Build monitoring, alerting, and self-healing capabilities.\n\n - Improve system observability through log analysis, dashboard development, and automated alerts based on established SLOs and SLAs.\n\n - Apply continuous dependency upgrades and remediate vulnerabilities within FedRAMP environments.\n\n - Assess infrastructure and deployment procedures to ensure compliance with internal policies and external regulations.\n\n - Respond to system and production issues in a timely manner.\n\n - Collaborate with engineering, security, and compliance teams when FedRAMP requirements affect infrastructure or operational decisions.\n\n - Follow Orca’s policies and procedures related to internal privileged-access rights.\n\n - Participate in regular collaboration with Orca’s Israel-based engineering team, including an 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time standup Monday through Thursday.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n - You are a U.S. citizen, as required for this FedRAMP environment.\n\n - You are based on the U.S. East Coast or can consistently work an East Coast schedule.\n\n - You have at least three years of experience in DevOps, infrastructure, platform, cloud, or site reliability engineering.\n\n - You have at least two to three years of meaningful, hands-on experience with Kubernetes in production.\n\n - You have personally built or substantially designed cloud infrastructure using Terraform or comparable infrastructure-as-code tooling.\n\n - You understand Terraform modules, state management, environment separation, code review, and CI/CD practices.\n\n - You have practical experience with Ansible for configuration management and automation.\n\n - You have experience building, operating, or directly supporting infrastructure within a FedRAMP-authorized environment.\n\n - You have strong experience working with public-cloud infrastructure, ideally AWS and AWS GovCloud.\n\n - You have designed and implemented sophisticated CI/CD pipelines.\n\n - You have experience with monitoring and observability tools such as Prometheus, Graphite, Grafana, CloudWatch, or similar platforms.\n\n - You have hands-on experience with Kubernetes and Helm.\n\n - You have programming experience with Python, Java, or Go, along with scripting experience using Bash or a similar language.\n\n - You understand system-level concepts including operating systems, networking, storage, and file-system management.\n\n - You can diagnose production problems independently and communicate the root cause, remediation, and preventive actions clearly.\n\n - You are self-driven, resourceful, organized, and eager to learn.\n\n - You have strong analytical and problem-solving abilities.\n\n - You have excellent written and verbal communication skills.\n\n - You hold a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, or equivalent practical experience.\n\n\n\n\nFEDRAMP EXPERIENCE\n\nThe strongest candidates will have directly participated in a FedRAMP authorization or continuous monitoring program, with experience in areas such as:\n\n - Operating AWS GovCloud infrastructure.\n\n - Implementing or maintaining security controls.\n\n - Defining or supporting authorization boundaries.\n\n - Resolving POA&M items.\n\n - Collecting technical evidence for audits.\n\n - Managing continuous monitoring and vulnerability remediation.\n\n - Working within FIPS requirements.\n\n - Supporting recurring audits or working with compliance teams and external assessors.\n\nCandidates may still qualify if they worked hands-on as a DevOps, platform, cloud, or infrastructure engineer within a FedRAMP-compliant organization, even if they did not personally lead the entire authorization process.\n\nGeneral knowledge of FedRAMP without practical engineering involvement will not be sufficient.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE OFFER\n\n - Competitive salary and equity package.\n\n - Discounted medical, dental, and vision benefits with significant employer contributions.\n\n - Benefits coverage beginning on your first day of employment.\n\n - Generous paid time off with U.S. holidays observed.\n\n - Flexible remote work environment.\n\n - Your choice of a Mac or Windows laptop.\n\n - Work-from-home stipend during your first month of employment.\n\n - Monthly reimbursement for your cell phone and home internet.\n\n - The opportunity to collaborate with talented colleagues around the world.\n\n\n\nThe annual salary range for this position is $170,000–$200,000. This represents the typical range based on experience, skills, and other relevant factors.\n\nThis position is open until filled. Applications will be accepted on an ongoing basis.\n\n\n\nOur client is an equal-opportunity employer. Qualified applicants will receive consideration without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender perception or identity, national origin, age, marital status, protected\n\nveteran status, disability status, or any other status protected by applicable law.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"1751f953-2091-4a8f-b269-71390f23dc22","title":"FullStack Engineer","department":"On-demand (contracts)","team":"On-demand (contracts)","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"Europe","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-14T13:05:08.834+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/1751f953-2091-4a8f-b269-71390f23dc22","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/1751f953-2091-4a8f-b269-71390f23dc22/application","descriptionHtml":"<h1>Senior Full-Stack Engineer — Backend Leaning (Laravel + React)</h1><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Location:</strong> Remote within Europe<br /><strong>Preferred locations:</strong> Czech Republic, Ukraine, Poland, or the UK<br /><strong>Contract rate:</strong> Up to $60 USD/hour<br /><strong>Core stack:</strong> PHP, Laravel, React, Inertia.js</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>About the company</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client builds APIs and developer tools for businesses working with creators. The company is profitable, growing quickly, and developing a unified API that allows customers to integrate with multiple creator and social platforms through consistent responses, webhooks, and SDKs.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The engineering team works with high-volume background processing, third-party platforms that can change without warning, and customer data that must remain accurate and reliable.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>The role</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We are looking for a senior full-stack engineer with a strong backend focus. You will build and maintain production systems in Laravel and PHP while contributing to customer-facing features in React.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is best suited to someone who enjoys investigating difficult production problems, building reliable integrations, and taking ownership in a small, highly autonomous team.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You do not need to have operated exactly 50 million jobs per day. However, you should be able to explain the systems you have owned, how they failed, and how you measured and improved their limits.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What you’ll do</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build and maintain production applications using Laravel, PHP, React, and Inertia.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Investigate production issues through logs, metrics, request flows, and queue behavior.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design reliable queues, workers, and webhook-delivery systems.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Handle retries, duplicate execution, rate limits, backpressure, worker failures, and slow upstream services.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build and maintain integrations with external and sometimes undocumented APIs.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Reverse engineer web or API behavior related to authentication, cookies, headers, request signing, rate limits, and other platform controls.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Create consistent API behavior across multiple creator and social platforms.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Improve database queries, worker capacity, job scheduling, and backend performance using measurable evidence.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build customer-facing dashboards and internal tools with accurate, clearly presented data.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Add automated tests for critical failure scenarios and previously identified production issues.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Keep API documentation, SDKs, and developer tools aligned with production behavior.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Independently investigate problems, communicate blockers, and contribute to technical decisions.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What we’re looking for</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong professional experience building and maintaining production applications with PHP and Laravel.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Practical React experience and the ability to deliver full-stack product features.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience operating queues, workers, asynchronous jobs, or event-driven systems in production.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Good understanding of concurrency, retries, idempotency, duplicate execution, backpressure, and rate limiting.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience building and maintaining APIs and third-party integrations.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong production-debugging skills, including the ability to explain how you identified and verified the cause of an incident.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with meaningful production volume or technically demanding backend workloads.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ability to verify that application data represents the correct product behavior, including distinguishing missing data, failed requests, and legitimate zero values.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong ownership, independent judgment, and comfort working without every requirement being defined upfront.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Regular use of AI development tools, combined with the ability to validate generated code and explain what you ship.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Professional English communication.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Based in Europe and able to work remotely as an independent contractor.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Nice to have</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience reverse engineering undocumented APIs or web clients.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with proxy infrastructure, bot detection, request signing, cookies, or TLS fingerprints.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Knowledge of OpenAPI, published SDKs, or MCP tools.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with creator platforms, social media APIs, or adjacent products.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with security testing or API abuse prevention.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with PostHog.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Inertia.js experience.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong personal projects, public code, open-source contributions, or independently launched products.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>How the team works</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is a small, asynchronous team that reviews progress weekly. Engineers are expected to keep others informed about decisions, blockers, and incidents. Production reliability and correct customer data take priority.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Working-hour overlap, incident coverage, response expectations, and any on-call arrangements will be discussed before an offer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Interview process</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A practical debugging exercise that can be completed using AI tools.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A 30-minute technical walkthrough of your solution and decisions.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Final decision.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The full process typically takes less than two weeks. The exercise takes approximately six to seven hours, including setup.</p>","descriptionPlain":"SENIOR FULL-STACK ENGINEER — BACKEND LEANING (LARAVEL + REACT)\n\nLocation: Remote within Europe\nPreferred locations: Czech Republic, Ukraine, Poland, or the UK\nContract rate: Up to $60 USD/hour\nCore stack: PHP, Laravel, React, Inertia.js\n\n\n\n\nABOUT THE COMPANY\n\nOur client builds APIs and developer tools for businesses working with creators. The company is profitable, growing quickly, and developing a unified API that allows customers to integrate with multiple creator and social platforms through consistent responses, webhooks, and SDKs.\n\nThe engineering team works with high-volume background processing, third-party platforms that can change without warning, and customer data that must remain accurate and reliable.\n\n\n\n\nTHE ROLE\n\nWe are looking for a senior full-stack engineer with a strong backend focus. You will build and maintain production systems in Laravel and PHP while contributing to customer-facing features in React.\n\nThis role is best suited to someone who enjoys investigating difficult production problems, building reliable integrations, and taking ownership in a small, highly autonomous team.\n\nYou do not need to have operated exactly 50 million jobs per day. However, you should be able to explain the systems you have owned, how they failed, and how you measured and improved their limits.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Build and maintain production applications using Laravel, PHP, React, and Inertia.\n\n - Investigate production issues through logs, metrics, request flows, and queue behavior.\n\n - Design reliable queues, workers, and webhook-delivery systems.\n\n - Handle retries, duplicate execution, rate limits, backpressure, worker failures, and slow upstream services.\n\n - Build and maintain integrations with external and sometimes undocumented APIs.\n\n - Reverse engineer web or API behavior related to authentication, cookies, headers, request signing, rate limits, and other platform controls.\n\n - Create consistent API behavior across multiple creator and social platforms.\n\n - Improve database queries, worker capacity, job scheduling, and backend performance using measurable evidence.\n\n - Build customer-facing dashboards and internal tools with accurate, clearly presented data.\n\n - Add automated tests for critical failure scenarios and previously identified production issues.\n\n - Keep API documentation, SDKs, and developer tools aligned with production behavior.\n\n - Independently investigate problems, communicate blockers, and contribute to technical decisions.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR\n\n - Strong professional experience building and maintaining production applications with PHP and Laravel.\n\n - Practical React experience and the ability to deliver full-stack product features.\n\n - Experience operating queues, workers, asynchronous jobs, or event-driven systems in production.\n\n - Good understanding of concurrency, retries, idempotency, duplicate execution, backpressure, and rate limiting.\n\n - Experience building and maintaining APIs and third-party integrations.\n\n - Strong production-debugging skills, including the ability to explain how you identified and verified the cause of an incident.\n\n - Experience with meaningful production volume or technically demanding backend workloads.\n\n - Ability to verify that application data represents the correct product behavior, including distinguishing missing data, failed requests, and legitimate zero values.\n\n - Strong ownership, independent judgment, and comfort working without every requirement being defined upfront.\n\n - Regular use of AI development tools, combined with the ability to validate generated code and explain what you ship.\n\n - Professional English communication.\n\n - Based in Europe and able to work remotely as an independent contractor.\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n - Experience reverse engineering undocumented APIs or web clients.\n\n - Experience with proxy infrastructure, bot detection, request signing, cookies, or TLS fingerprints.\n\n - Knowledge of OpenAPI, published SDKs, or MCP tools.\n\n - Experience with creator platforms, social media APIs, or adjacent products.\n\n - Experience with security testing or API abuse prevention.\n\n - Experience with PostHog.\n\n - Inertia.js experience.\n\n - Strong personal projects, public code, open-source contributions, or independently launched products.\n\n\n\n\nHOW THE TEAM WORKS\n\nThis is a small, asynchronous team that reviews progress weekly. Engineers are expected to keep others informed about decisions, blockers, and incidents. Production reliability and correct customer data take priority.\n\nWorking-hour overlap, incident coverage, response expectations, and any on-call arrangements will be discussed before an offer.\n\n\n\n\nINTERVIEW PROCESS\n\n - A practical debugging exercise that can be completed using AI tools.\n\n - A 30-minute technical walkthrough of your solution and decisions.\n\n - Final decision.\n\nThe full process typically takes less than two weeks. The exercise takes approximately six to seven hours, including setup.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"84775a4e-5fc7-4715-a343-9df94b3ad9a6","title":"Head of Psysical AI","department":"Direct&Permanent Hires","team":"Direct&Permanent Hires","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"Europe","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-14T17:27:22.975+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/84775a4e-5fc7-4715-a343-9df94b3ad9a6","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/84775a4e-5fc7-4715-a343-9df94b3ad9a6/application","descriptionHtml":"<h1>Head of Physical AI</h1><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Location:</strong> Remote — Europe and the United States preferred; exceptional candidates globally will be considered<br /><strong>Employment:</strong> Full-time<br /><strong>Reports to:</strong> CEO<br /><strong>Role type:</strong> Hands-on technical leader and team builder<br /><strong>Travel:</strong> As needed</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>About our Client</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client builds the data, evaluation, and deployment layer for Physical AI.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">The company works across multimodal robot and human data, annotation and assurance, model evaluation, and the systems that turn physical-world experience into useful robot behavior.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Miraxis is hardware- and model-agnostic. What matters is whether a dataset, model, or method produces a measurable improvement on a real task. The company will build focused model and evaluation capabilities where they strengthen its data products, demonstrate the value of its data, or solve a clear customer or partner problem.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>The role</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client is looking for a Head of Physical AI to establish and lead its AI research and engineering function.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will decide which Physical AI problems the company pursues, define how results are evaluated, and remain directly involved in the most important technical work. You will connect four areas that are often treated separately:</p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Multimodal and embodied data</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Transformer-based models and robot policies</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Rigorous offline and real-world evaluation</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Deployment on physical systems</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is a player-coach role. During your first year, at least half of your time will be spent on direct technical work: designing models and experiments, writing or reviewing code, inspecting data, debugging training runs, analyzing failures, and reviewing robot rollouts.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will also build a small, focused team of researchers and engineers as the work requires it.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What you’ll do</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Define a focused Physical AI research and engineering roadmap with clear hypotheses, baselines, milestones, success measures, and stop criteria.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Select the model families Miraxis should train, adapt, or evaluate and determine when to build internally, use open models, license technology, or work through partners.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Personally design, adapt, train, and evaluate Transformer-based systems for embodied tasks.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work across areas such as vision-language-action models, multimodal Transformers, robot foundation models, action representation, imitation learning, reinforcement learning, world models, cross-embodiment transfer, and robot-policy evaluation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Define the sensors, modalities, annotations, data mixtures, coverage, and quality controls required to train and evaluate selected models.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Measure how data quality, diversity, and composition affect model behavior and real-world task performance.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Establish reproducible offline and real-world evaluation systems, baselines, held-out conditions, and release gates.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Protect evaluations against leakage, overfitting, and weak or misleading success criteria.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Take projects from problem definition through training, hardware integration, and real-world validation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Analyze failures across data, perception, models, control, hardware, and the operating environment.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design safe, staged physical testing and deployment plans with clear supervision and rollback mechanisms.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Recruit and lead a small team of complementary researchers and engineers.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Lead architecture, experiment, code, rollout, and failure reviews.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Translate customer and partner needs into testable technical requirements.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Communicate technical strategy, evidence, uncertainty, and limitations clearly to customers, partners, and investors.</p></li></ul><h2>What we’re looking for</h2><h3>Deep, hands-on Transformer expertise</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is a hard requirement. You must have personally made material architecture or training decisions in at least one substantial Transformer-based system, such as:</p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Vision Transformers</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Vision-language or vision-language-action models</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Multimodal foundation models</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Decision Transformers</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Diffusion Transformers</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Video Transformers</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">World models</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Transformer-based perception, planning, or control systems</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be able to explain how you represented and tokenized inputs and outputs, fused modalities, structured attention and temporal context, selected losses, built data mixtures, distributed and monitored training, diagnosed failures, and changed the system to improve task performance.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Using hosted model APIs, prompting language models, or running an unchanged public training recipe does not meet this requirement.</p><h3>Physical AI experience</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have worked on machine learning for a system that perceives or acts in the physical world, such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, drones, industrial automation, manipulation, mobile robots, humanoids, or wearable and egocentric systems.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">At least one substantial project must have progressed beyond offline datasets or simulation into a real or operational physical system. Simulation experience qualifies only when paired with credible sim-to-real ownership and physical validation.</p><h3>Hands-on technical ability</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong Python engineering skills</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Direct experience with PyTorch or an equivalent deep-learning framework</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ability to read and debug unfamiliar model and training code</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience designing controlled experiments and analyzing rollout failures</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience working with large multimodal datasets</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Sound judgment around compute, memory, training stability, inference latency, and cost</p></li></ul><h3>Technical leadership</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You have set the direction for a significant research, model-development, robotics, or cross-functional technical program. You have made architecture and resource decisions, mentored or hired technical talent, stopped weak lines of work, and helped take a result into deployment.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A management title is not required, but direct technical ownership is.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>Strongly preferred</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Candidates combining deep Transformer expertise with strong computer-vision experience will receive priority. Relevant areas include:</p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Visual representation learning</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">VLMs and video or temporal modeling</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Detection, segmentation, and tracking</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Multi-view and egocentric vision</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">3D and spatial reasoning</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Pose estimation, calibration, and localization</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Sensor fusion</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Real-time vision systems</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Additional valuable experience includes:</p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Vision-language-action models or robot foundation models</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Action tokenization or continuous action generation</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Diffusion or flow-matching policies</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Imitation learning or reinforcement learning</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">World models and cross-embodiment training</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Robot manipulation</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Distributed training and inference optimization</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">ROS 2</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Sim-to-real transfer</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Safety-critical systems</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Widely used open-source work or personally owned research publications</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Early-stage company experience</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work with technical customers or research partners</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A PhD in machine learning, computer vision, robotics, computer science, or a related field is valuable but not required. An equivalent record of original model work, technical leadership, and real-system delivery is equally relevant.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Miraxis cares most about what you personally designed, trained, evaluated, and deployed.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2>What success looks like</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Within 90 days:</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Audit Miraxis’s data, evaluation assets, partnerships, and model opportunities.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Select one or two focused research bets.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Establish a reproducible model baseline and initial evaluation suite.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Define a credible path to physical validation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Present a practical 12-month roadmap supported by working technical evidence.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Within six months:</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Train, adapt, or rigorously evaluate at least one relevant Transformer-based model or robot policy.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Confirm or reject at least one important technical hypothesis.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Establish a repeatable data-to-training-to-evaluation workflow.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Test on a real robot, directly or through a credible hardware partner.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Document representative failures and their implications.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Within twelve months:</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Demonstrate a measurable improvement attributable to Miraxis data, methods, or assurance systems.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Close the loop between model failures, data decisions, retraining, and re-evaluation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Deliver a model, benchmark, evaluation system, or deployment that a customer or partner can use.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build a small team capable of running the work without unnecessary process layers.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Success will be judged by decision quality, reproducibility, real-system results, and customer value—not by team size, paper count, parameter count, or experiment volume.</p>","descriptionPlain":"HEAD OF PHYSICAL AI\n\nLocation: Remote — Europe and the United States preferred; exceptional candidates globally will be considered\nEmployment: Full-time\nReports to: CEO\nRole type: Hands-on technical leader and team builder\nTravel: As needed\n\n\n\n\nABOUT OUR CLIENT\n\nOur client builds the data, evaluation, and deployment layer for Physical AI.\n\nThe company works across multimodal robot and human data, annotation and assurance, model evaluation, and the systems that turn physical-world experience into useful robot behavior.\n\nMiraxis is hardware- and model-agnostic. What matters is whether a dataset, model, or method produces a measurable improvement on a real task. The company will build focused model and evaluation capabilities where they strengthen its data products, demonstrate the value of its data, or solve a clear customer or partner problem.\n\n\n\n\nTHE ROLE\n\nOur client is looking for a Head of Physical AI to establish and lead its AI research and engineering function.\n\nYou will decide which Physical AI problems the company pursues, define how results are evaluated, and remain directly involved in the most important technical work. You will connect four areas that are often treated separately:\n\n - Multimodal and embodied data\n\n - Transformer-based models and robot policies\n\n - Rigorous offline and real-world evaluation\n\n - Deployment on physical systems\n\nThis is a player-coach role. During your first year, at least half of your time will be spent on direct technical work: designing models and experiments, writing or reviewing code, inspecting data, debugging training runs, analyzing failures, and reviewing robot rollouts.\n\nYou will also build a small, focused team of researchers and engineers as the work requires it.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Define a focused Physical AI research and engineering roadmap with clear hypotheses, baselines, milestones, success measures, and stop criteria.\n\n - Select the model families Miraxis should train, adapt, or evaluate and determine when to build internally, use open models, license technology, or work through partners.\n\n - Personally design, adapt, train, and evaluate Transformer-based systems for embodied tasks.\n\n - Work across areas such as vision-language-action models, multimodal Transformers, robot foundation models, action representation, imitation learning, reinforcement learning, world models, cross-embodiment transfer, and robot-policy evaluation.\n\n - Define the sensors, modalities, annotations, data mixtures, coverage, and quality controls required to train and evaluate selected models.\n\n - Measure how data quality, diversity, and composition affect model behavior and real-world task performance.\n\n - Establish reproducible offline and real-world evaluation systems, baselines, held-out conditions, and release gates.\n\n - Protect evaluations against leakage, overfitting, and weak or misleading success criteria.\n\n - Take projects from problem definition through training, hardware integration, and real-world validation.\n\n - Analyze failures across data, perception, models, control, hardware, and the operating environment.\n\n - Design safe, staged physical testing and deployment plans with clear supervision and rollback mechanisms.\n\n - Recruit and lead a small team of complementary researchers and engineers.\n\n - Lead architecture, experiment, code, rollout, and failure reviews.\n\n - Translate customer and partner needs into testable technical requirements.\n\n - Communicate technical strategy, evidence, uncertainty, and limitations clearly to customers, partners, and investors.\n\n\nWHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR\n\n\nDEEP, HANDS-ON TRANSFORMER EXPERTISE\n\nThis is a hard requirement. You must have personally made material architecture or training decisions in at least one substantial Transformer-based system, such as:\n\n - Vision Transformers\n\n - Vision-language or vision-language-action models\n\n - Multimodal foundation models\n\n - Decision Transformers\n\n - Diffusion Transformers\n\n - Video Transformers\n\n - World models\n\n - Transformer-based perception, planning, or control systems\n\nYou should be able to explain how you represented and tokenized inputs and outputs, fused modalities, structured attention and temporal context, selected losses, built data mixtures, distributed and monitored training, diagnosed failures, and changed the system to improve task performance.\n\nUsing hosted model APIs, prompting language models, or running an unchanged public training recipe does not meet this requirement.\n\n\nPHYSICAL AI EXPERIENCE\n\nYou have worked on machine learning for a system that perceives or acts in the physical world, such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, drones, industrial automation, manipulation, mobile robots, humanoids, or wearable and egocentric systems.\n\nAt least one substantial project must have progressed beyond offline datasets or simulation into a real or operational physical system. Simulation experience qualifies only when paired with credible sim-to-real ownership and physical validation.\n\n\nHANDS-ON TECHNICAL ABILITY\n\n - Strong Python engineering skills\n\n - Direct experience with PyTorch or an equivalent deep-learning framework\n\n - Ability to read and debug unfamiliar model and training code\n\n - Experience designing controlled experiments and analyzing rollout failures\n\n - Experience working with large multimodal datasets\n\n - Sound judgment around compute, memory, training stability, inference latency, and cost\n\n\nTECHNICAL LEADERSHIP\n\nYou have set the direction for a significant research, model-development, robotics, or cross-functional technical program. You have made architecture and resource decisions, mentored or hired technical talent, stopped weak lines of work, and helped take a result into deployment.\n\nA management title is not required, but direct technical ownership is.\n\n\n\n\nSTRONGLY PREFERRED\n\nCandidates combining deep Transformer expertise with strong computer-vision experience will receive priority. Relevant areas include:\n\n - Visual representation learning\n\n - VLMs and video or temporal modeling\n\n - Detection, segmentation, and tracking\n\n - Multi-view and egocentric vision\n\n - 3D and spatial reasoning\n\n - Pose estimation, calibration, and localization\n\n - Sensor fusion\n\n - Real-time vision systems\n\nAdditional valuable experience includes:\n\n - Vision-language-action models or robot foundation models\n\n - Action tokenization or continuous action generation\n\n - Diffusion or flow-matching policies\n\n - Imitation learning or reinforcement learning\n\n - World models and cross-embodiment training\n\n - Robot manipulation\n\n - Distributed training and inference optimization\n\n - ROS 2\n\n - Sim-to-real transfer\n\n - Safety-critical systems\n\n - Widely used open-source work or personally owned research publications\n\n - Early-stage company experience\n\n - Work with technical customers or research partners\n\nA PhD in machine learning, computer vision, robotics, computer science, or a related field is valuable but not required. An equivalent record of original model work, technical leadership, and real-system delivery is equally relevant.\n\nMiraxis cares most about what you personally designed, trained, evaluated, and deployed.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE\n\nWithin 90 days:\n\n - Audit Miraxis’s data, evaluation assets, partnerships, and model opportunities.\n\n - Select one or two focused research bets.\n\n - Establish a reproducible model baseline and initial evaluation suite.\n\n - Define a credible path to physical validation.\n\n - Present a practical 12-month roadmap supported by working technical evidence.\n\nWithin six months:\n\n - Train, adapt, or rigorously evaluate at least one relevant Transformer-based model or robot policy.\n\n - Confirm or reject at least one important technical hypothesis.\n\n - Establish a repeatable data-to-training-to-evaluation workflow.\n\n - Test on a real robot, directly or through a credible hardware partner.\n\n - Document representative failures and their implications.\n\nWithin twelve months:\n\n - Demonstrate a measurable improvement attributable to Miraxis data, methods, or assurance systems.\n\n - Close the loop between model failures, data decisions, retraining, and re-evaluation.\n\n - Deliver a model, benchmark, evaluation system, or deployment that a customer or partner can use.\n\n - Build a small team capable of running the work without unnecessary process layers.\n\nSuccess will be judged by decision quality, reproducibility, real-system results, and customer value—not by team size, paper count, parameter count, or experiment volume.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"ae69d8d4-cd1f-4573-baa9-191a55b61298","title":"AI Engineer, Agents & Search","department":"Direct&Permanent Hires","team":"Direct&Permanent Hires","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"LATAM","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-22T18:27:51.959+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/ae69d8d4-cd1f-4573-baa9-191a55b61298","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/ae69d8d4-cd1f-4573-baa9-191a55b61298/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Employment:</strong> Full-time, direct hire<br /><strong>Location:</strong> Remote — United States or Latin America<br /><strong>US compensation:</strong> $170,000–$230,000+ annual base, depending on experience and scope. Flexibility toward the higher end for the right staff-level engineer.<br /><strong>LATAM compensation:</strong> A separate, lower regional range applies and will be discussed during the recruiting process.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>About our Client</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client builds AI-powered software for healthcare staffing. Its platform helps recruiters find healthcare providers, personalize outreach, manage ongoing conversations, and connect interested providers with relevant opportunities.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>About the role</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client is looking for an AI Engineer to build and operate production agent systems, with a focus on agent orchestration, search, retrieval, and evaluation.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You’ll develop the backend systems that allow agents to use tools, retrieve relevant information, maintain state, and complete workflows reliably. You should be comfortable taking systems from implementation through production operation and using repeatable evaluations to determine whether changes actually improve results.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>What you’ll do</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build and improve production LLM agents and the orchestration layer that controls their execution.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Design tool-calling systems, including tool interfaces, validation, error handling, and recovery.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Develop retrieval pipelines combining structured filters, keyword search, embeddings, and reranking.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Build repeatable evaluations and experiments to measure agent behavior, retrieval quality, and regressions.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Implement durable, asynchronous workflows that handle retries, interruptions, and long-running tasks.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Investigate production failures and improve reliability, latency, cost, and observability.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Apply strong backend engineering practices to AI features used in real recruiting workflows.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>What we’re looking for</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Hands-on experience building, deploying, and operating LLM agent systems used in production.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong backend engineering fundamentals, with TypeScript experience or proficiency in an equivalent backend language.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Practical experience designing agent orchestration or harnesses, including execution control, state management, and tool use.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with RAG or search systems and an understanding of how filtering, keyword retrieval, embeddings, and reranking work together.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience building repeatable evaluations, comparing approaches, and identifying meaningful improvements.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with asynchronous processing and reliable workflows.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ability to explain architectural decisions, production failures, and the trade-offs behind your solutions.</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h3>Nice to have</h3><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience in healthcare, staffing, recruiting technology, or related workflows.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Staff-level technical ownership across architecture, delivery, and production operation.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience improving both retrieval quality and downstream agent task completion.</p></li></ul><h3>Interview process</h3><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Resume review → G2i video screen for external applicants → direct technical fit review by Fetch → interviews focused on production agent systems, orchestration, tooling, and evaluation.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Target start:</strong> Before December.</p>","descriptionPlain":"Employment: Full-time, direct hire\nLocation: Remote — United States or Latin America\nUS compensation: $170,000–$230,000+ annual base, depending on experience and scope. Flexibility toward the higher end for the right staff-level engineer.\nLATAM compensation: A separate, lower regional range applies and will be discussed during the recruiting process.\n\n\n\n\nABOUT OUR CLIENT\n\nOur client builds AI-powered software for healthcare staffing. Its platform helps recruiters find healthcare providers, personalize outreach, manage ongoing conversations, and connect interested providers with relevant opportunities.\n\n\n\n\nABOUT THE ROLE\n\nOur client is looking for an AI Engineer to build and operate production agent systems, with a focus on agent orchestration, search, retrieval, and evaluation.\n\nYou’ll develop the backend systems that allow agents to use tools, retrieve relevant information, maintain state, and complete workflows reliably. You should be comfortable taking systems from implementation through production operation and using repeatable evaluations to determine whether changes actually improve results.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Build and improve production LLM agents and the orchestration layer that controls their execution.\n\n - Design tool-calling systems, including tool interfaces, validation, error handling, and recovery.\n\n - Develop retrieval pipelines combining structured filters, keyword search, embeddings, and reranking.\n\n - Build repeatable evaluations and experiments to measure agent behavior, retrieval quality, and regressions.\n\n - Implement durable, asynchronous workflows that handle retries, interruptions, and long-running tasks.\n\n - Investigate production failures and improve reliability, latency, cost, and observability.\n\n - Apply strong backend engineering practices to AI features used in real recruiting workflows.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR\n\n - Hands-on experience building, deploying, and operating LLM agent systems used in production.\n\n - Strong backend engineering fundamentals, with TypeScript experience or proficiency in an equivalent backend language.\n\n - Practical experience designing agent orchestration or harnesses, including execution control, state management, and tool use.\n\n - Experience with RAG or search systems and an understanding of how filtering, keyword retrieval, embeddings, and reranking work together.\n\n - Experience building repeatable evaluations, comparing approaches, and identifying meaningful improvements.\n\n - Experience with asynchronous processing and reliable workflows.\n\n - Ability to explain architectural decisions, production failures, and the trade-offs behind your solutions.\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n - Experience in healthcare, staffing, recruiting technology, or related workflows.\n\n - Staff-level technical ownership across architecture, delivery, and production operation.\n\n - Experience improving both retrieval quality and downstream agent task completion.\n\n\nINTERVIEW PROCESS\n\nResume review → G2i video screen for external applicants → direct technical fit review by Fetch → interviews focused on production agent systems, orchestration, tooling, and evaluation.\n\nTarget start: Before December.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"e375fee4-35a0-40b3-8869-744683056806","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - AU","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Australia","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:16:11.836+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Australia","addressCountry":"Australia"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/e375fee4-35a0-40b3-8869-744683056806","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/e375fee4-35a0-40b3-8869-744683056806/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"9db8030d-ca16-430d-958a-2070fc3d1a53","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Canada","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Toronto","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[{"location":"Calgary","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Alberta","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Calgary"}}},{"location":"Mississauga","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ontario","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Mississauga"}}},{"location":"Vancouver","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"British Columbia","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Vancouver"}}},{"location":"Montreal","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Quebec","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Montreal"}}},{"location":"Ottawa","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ontario","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Ottawa"}}},{"location":"Winnipeg","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Manitoba","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Winnipeg"}}},{"location":"Edmonton","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Alberta","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Edmonton"}}}],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:49:08.328+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Ontario","addressCountry":"Canada","addressLocality":"Toronto"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/9db8030d-ca16-430d-958a-2070fc3d1a53","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/9db8030d-ca16-430d-958a-2070fc3d1a53/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"7bbaa412-7477-4017-a790-c3d5d24d332a","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - NZ","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"New Zealand","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:18:10.185+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"New Zealand","addressCountry":"United Kingdom","addressLocality":""}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/7bbaa412-7477-4017-a790-c3d5d24d332a","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/7bbaa412-7477-4017-a790-c3d5d24d332a/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"583075a5-b9a5-40ca-9359-a1ac37f871ac","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - US","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"United States","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:11:14.289+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"United States"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/583075a5-b9a5-40ca-9359-a1ac37f871ac","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/583075a5-b9a5-40ca-9359-a1ac37f871ac/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"3651e933-2b15-48e4-b854-0520d82ab784","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - CA","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Canada","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:11:59.773+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Canada"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/3651e933-2b15-48e4-b854-0520d82ab784","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/3651e933-2b15-48e4-b854-0520d82ab784/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"b59d6214-1240-4776-866f-bdeb193fbbd9","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - UK","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"United Kingdom","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T13:13:26.856+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"United Kingdom"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/b59d6214-1240-4776-866f-bdeb193fbbd9","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/b59d6214-1240-4776-866f-bdeb193fbbd9/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"9852de31-64e1-4dbb-bff9-65adfca33be9","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Ireland","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Limerick","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[{"location":"Dublin","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Dublin","addressCountry":"Ireland","addressLocality":"Dublin"}}},{"location":"Cork","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Cork","addressCountry":"Ireland","addressLocality":"Cork"}}}],"publishedAt":"2026-09-28T19:11:52.953+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressRegion":"Limerick","addressCountry":"Ireland","addressLocality":"Limerick"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/9852de31-64e1-4dbb-bff9-65adfca33be9","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/9852de31-64e1-4dbb-bff9-65adfca33be9/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"a9da315f-96a6-40f6-a569-96b31b938768","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:51:48.785+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/a9da315f-96a6-40f6-a569-96b31b938768","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/a9da315f-96a6-40f6-a569-96b31b938768/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"70c018bc-d3b5-426f-bfd5-ae94891dcc7f","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Brazil","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Brazil","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:33:18.293+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/70c018bc-d3b5-426f-bfd5-ae94891dcc7f","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/70c018bc-d3b5-426f-bfd5-ae94891dcc7f/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"7c54f48a-bd33-491a-8130-f1c9b1dfccb1","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:47:16.140+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/7c54f48a-bd33-491a-8130-f1c9b1dfccb1","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/7c54f48a-bd33-491a-8130-f1c9b1dfccb1/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"c7cd537c-6380-4da5-800f-031da18b5a2e","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Argentina","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Argentina","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:54:24.543+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Argentina"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/c7cd537c-6380-4da5-800f-031da18b5a2e","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/c7cd537c-6380-4da5-800f-031da18b5a2e/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"6f5d8b62-52c7-48cb-9362-1dfcf8d815c0","title":"Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - LATAM","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:50:26.565+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/6f5d8b62-52c7-48cb-9362-1dfcf8d815c0","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/6f5d8b62-52c7-48cb-9362-1dfcf8d815c0/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"991a6fba-7476-48d9-9a40-db5c4d1fdd9b","title":"Senior Software Engineer, (OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor)","department":"G2i Eng Team","team":"G2i Eng Team","employmentType":"Contract","location":"Remote","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-09-30T21:59:46.947+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"Remote"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/991a6fba-7476-48d9-9a40-db5c4d1fdd9b","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/991a6fba-7476-48d9-9a40-db5c4d1fdd9b/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Check out this Loom video for more details: </strong><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" href=\"https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\">https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5</a></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What this role actually is</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the response makes sense</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What you'll be doing</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>What we mean by \"taste\"</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Would this interaction build or erode trust?</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Who you are</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• High bar for what good engineering looks like</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Nice to have</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"></p><h2><strong>Engagement details</strong></h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview</p>","descriptionPlain":"Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week\n\n\n\nCheck out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5\n\n\n\nWe're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.\n\n\n\nThis is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT THIS ROLE ACTUALLY IS\n\nYou will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:\n\n• Whether the response makes sense\n\n• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful\n\n• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment\n\n• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer\n\nThis role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.\n\n\n\n\nWHAT YOU'LL BE DOING\n\n• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end\n\n• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think\n\n• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code\n\n• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)\n\n• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading\n\n• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code\n\n\n\n\nWHAT WE MEAN BY \"TASTE\"\n\nWe're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:\n\n• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?\n\n• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?\n\n• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?\n\n• Would this interaction build or erode trust?\n\nYou should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.\n\n\n\n\nWHO YOU ARE\n\n• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)\n\n• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python\n\n• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor\n\n• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows\n\n• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line\n\n• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement\n\n• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback\n\n• High bar for what good engineering looks like\n\n\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows\n\n• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards\n\n\n\n\nENGAGEMENT DETAILS\n\n• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location\n\n• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible\n\n• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well\n\n• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat\n\n• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"ea01f2b2-1b58-4894-bba8-83b44c5db176","title":"Senior Product Manager - ICA","department":"Outbound","team":"Outbound","employmentType":"Contract","location":"United States","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-10-06T13:46:39.462+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":true,"workplaceType":"Remote","address":{"postalAddress":{"addressCountry":"United States"}},"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/ea01f2b2-1b58-4894-bba8-83b44c5db176","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/ea01f2b2-1b58-4894-bba8-83b44c5db176/application","descriptionHtml":"<p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Senior Product Manager, Data &amp; AI (Document Intelligence)</strong><br /><strong>Client opportunity via G2i</strong> · Remote (continental US, Eastern Time) · DC/Metro area preferred</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>About this opportunity</strong><br />G2i is hiring on behalf of one of our clients, a fast-growing, DC-based government services firm. Since 2009 they have helped federal agencies and large government primes in three areas: research and data analysis, advanced data science, and strategic services. They currently support several analytics and research programs across HHS. The team is collaborative and small enough that your work is visible, and they take work-life balance seriously.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">You'd be hired through G2i and work embedded with the client's team.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>The role</strong><br />You'll own the product roadmap for the client's document intelligence platform. You'll turn customer and reviewer needs into clear, testable requirements and make sure each problem is fixed in the right place. That could be the UX, the source data, the extraction pipeline, the model, the search logic, the thresholds, or the business rules.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This role suits a product leader who knows that AI products need measurable definitions of quality: accuracy, false-positive rates, reviewer effort, evidence requirements and operational performance.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>What you'll do</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Own the roadmap and priorities across data engineering, data science, backend, search and frontend teams</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Lead discovery with clients and internal stakeholders using prototypes, demos and working software</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Turn business needs into requirements, user stories, business rules and measurable acceptance criteria</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Define requirements for document processing, alerts, scoring, evidence presentation, search, review workflows and source traceability</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work with data scientists on evaluation datasets, model metrics, confidence thresholds, and acceptable false-positive and false-negative rates</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Work with data engineers on ingestion, normalization, metadata, lineage, processing completeness and data quality</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Diagnose whether an issue comes from the UI, data, model, pipeline, search, thresholds or business rules</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Favor reusable platform capabilities over one-off client customizations</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Coordinate release readiness, client demos and structured feedback</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Measure accuracy, completeness, reviewer effort, latency, reliability, adoption and cost</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Communicate priorities, tradeoffs and limitations clearly to clients and internal teams</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>What you bring</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Senior PM experience delivering AI/ML, data-intensive, search or workflow products</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience prioritizing work across data, ML, backend and frontend teams</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A track record of discovery driven by prototypes or demos</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Skill turning business needs into detailed, technical, testable requirements</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience defining acceptance criteria for probabilistic features such as model outputs, alerts, recommendations or rankings</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">A solid grasp of data pipelines, APIs, data quality, system dependencies and model behavior</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Close working experience with data scientists, data engineers, software engineers and UX</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong stakeholder management, facilitation, writing and decision-making</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>Requirements</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Authorized to work in the US, with 3+ consecutive years living in the US</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Able and willing to obtain a Public Trust clearance</p></li></ul><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><br /><strong>Nice to have</strong></p><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Document intelligence, OCR, semantic or vector search, generative AI, or human-in-the-loop workflows</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Products built on AWS (e.g. S3, DynamoDB, OpenSearch, Step Functions, SQS, EventBridge, Bedrock, SageMaker, Textract)</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Regulated, healthcare, medical-device or other high-stakes products</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Model governance, explainability, evidence traceability and reviewer workflows</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Supporting multiple clients while keeping one coherent, reusable roadmap</p></li></ul>","descriptionPlain":"Senior Product Manager, Data & AI (Document Intelligence)\nClient opportunity via G2i · Remote (continental US, Eastern Time) · DC/Metro area preferred\n\nAbout this opportunity\nG2i is hiring on behalf of one of our clients, a fast-growing, DC-based government services firm. Since 2009 they have helped federal agencies and large government primes in three areas: research and data analysis, advanced data science, and strategic services. They currently support several analytics and research programs across HHS. The team is collaborative and small enough that your work is visible, and they take work-life balance seriously.\n\nYou'd be hired through G2i and work embedded with the client's team.\n\n\nThe role\nYou'll own the product roadmap for the client's document intelligence platform. You'll turn customer and reviewer needs into clear, testable requirements and make sure each problem is fixed in the right place. That could be the UX, the source data, the extraction pipeline, the model, the search logic, the thresholds, or the business rules.\n\nThis role suits a product leader who knows that AI products need measurable definitions of quality: accuracy, false-positive rates, reviewer effort, evidence requirements and operational performance.\n\n\nWhat you'll do\n\n - Own the roadmap and priorities across data engineering, data science, backend, search and frontend teams\n\n - Lead discovery with clients and internal stakeholders using prototypes, demos and working software\n\n - Turn business needs into requirements, user stories, business rules and measurable acceptance criteria\n\n - Define requirements for document processing, alerts, scoring, evidence presentation, search, review workflows and source traceability\n\n - Work with data scientists on evaluation datasets, model metrics, confidence thresholds, and acceptable false-positive and false-negative rates\n\n - Work with data engineers on ingestion, normalization, metadata, lineage, processing completeness and data quality\n\n - Diagnose whether an issue comes from the UI, data, model, pipeline, search, thresholds or business rules\n\n - Favor reusable platform capabilities over one-off client customizations\n\n - Coordinate release readiness, client demos and structured feedback\n\n - Measure accuracy, completeness, reviewer effort, latency, reliability, adoption and cost\n\n - Communicate priorities, tradeoffs and limitations clearly to clients and internal teams\n\n\nWhat you bring\n\n - Senior PM experience delivering AI/ML, data-intensive, search or workflow products\n\n - Experience prioritizing work across data, ML, backend and frontend teams\n\n - A track record of discovery driven by prototypes or demos\n\n - Skill turning business needs into detailed, technical, testable requirements\n\n - Experience defining acceptance criteria for probabilistic features such as model outputs, alerts, recommendations or rankings\n\n - A solid grasp of data pipelines, APIs, data quality, system dependencies and model behavior\n\n - Close working experience with data scientists, data engineers, software engineers and UX\n\n - Strong stakeholder management, facilitation, writing and decision-making\n\n\nRequirements\n\n - Authorized to work in the US, with 3+ consecutive years living in the US\n\n - Able and willing to obtain a Public Trust clearance\n\n\nNice to have\n\n - Document intelligence, OCR, semantic or vector search, generative AI, or human-in-the-loop workflows\n\n - Products built on AWS (e.g. S3, DynamoDB, OpenSearch, Step Functions, SQS, EventBridge, Bedrock, SageMaker, Textract)\n\n - Regulated, healthcare, medical-device or other high-stakes products\n\n - Model governance, explainability, evidence traceability and reviewer workflows\n\n - Supporting multiple clients while keeping one coherent, reusable roadmap","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}},{"id":"d9a764c2-b471-4006-8da1-42f67874fd04","title":"Software Engineer ","department":"On-demand (contracts)","team":"On-demand (contracts)","employmentType":"FullTime","location":"LATAM","shouldDisplayCompensationOnJobPostings":false,"secondaryLocations":[],"publishedAt":"2026-10-08T19:11:52.848+00:00","isListed":true,"isRemote":null,"workplaceType":null,"address":null,"jobUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/d9a764c2-b471-4006-8da1-42f67874fd04","applyUrl":"https://jobs.ashbyhq.com/g2i/d9a764c2-b471-4006-8da1-42f67874fd04/application","descriptionHtml":"<h1>Elixir Software Developer — LATAM</h1><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><strong>Location:</strong> Remote, Latin America<br /><strong>Engagement:</strong> Full-time contract<br /><strong>Duration:</strong> 6+ months<br /><strong>Compensation:</strong> Up to USD $33/hour, depending on experience and fit</p><h2>About our Client</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Our client helps freight brokers and trucking companies manage working capital, payments, collections, and back-office operations. Its platform simplifies financial and operational workflows so customers can focus on growing their businesses.</p><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">G2i is looking for an Elixir Software Developer to work with Denim on a full-time contract lasting six months or longer.</p><h2>What you’ll do</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Develop and maintain software using Elixir.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Collaborate with the engineering team to deliver product features and improvements.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Write maintainable, tested code and participate in code reviews.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Investigate bugs and improve application reliability and performance.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Contribute to technical discussions and communicate progress and blockers.</p></li></ul><h2>What we’re looking for</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Professional experience developing and maintaining Elixir applications in production.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Strong understanding of functional programming and Elixir fundamentals.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience testing, debugging, and maintaining production software.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Familiarity with Git and collaborative development workflows.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Ability to communicate effectively in English.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Based in Latin America and available for a full-time contract lasting at least six months.</p></li></ul><h2>Nice to have</h2><ul style=\"min-height:1.5em\"><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with Phoenix, Ecto, or OTP.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience building APIs and working with relational databases.</p></li><li><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">Experience with fintech, payments, logistics, or other business-critical applications.</p></li></ul><h2>Contract details</h2><p style=\"min-height:1.5em\">This opportunity offers a full-time contract of six months or longer, with compensation of up to USD $53 per hour. The final rate will depend on experience and fit.</p>","descriptionPlain":"ELIXIR SOFTWARE DEVELOPER — LATAM\n\nLocation: Remote, Latin America\nEngagement: Full-time contract\nDuration: 6+ months\nCompensation: Up to USD $33/hour, depending on experience and fit\n\n\nABOUT OUR CLIENT\n\nOur client helps freight brokers and trucking companies manage working capital, payments, collections, and back-office operations. Its platform simplifies financial and operational workflows so customers can focus on growing their businesses.\n\nG2i is looking for an Elixir Software Developer to work with Denim on a full-time contract lasting six months or longer.\n\n\nWHAT YOU’LL DO\n\n - Develop and maintain software using Elixir.\n\n - Collaborate with the engineering team to deliver product features and improvements.\n\n - Write maintainable, tested code and participate in code reviews.\n\n - Investigate bugs and improve application reliability and performance.\n\n - Contribute to technical discussions and communicate progress and blockers.\n\n\nWHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR\n\n - Professional experience developing and maintaining Elixir applications in production.\n\n - Strong understanding of functional programming and Elixir fundamentals.\n\n - Experience testing, debugging, and maintaining production software.\n\n - Familiarity with Git and collaborative development workflows.\n\n - Ability to communicate effectively in English.\n\n - Based in Latin America and available for a full-time contract lasting at least six months.\n\n\nNICE TO HAVE\n\n - Experience with Phoenix, Ecto, or OTP.\n\n - Experience building APIs and working with relational databases.\n\n - Experience with fintech, payments, logistics, or other business-critical applications.\n\n\nCONTRACT DETAILS\n\nThis opportunity offers a full-time contract of six months or longer, with compensation of up to USD $53 per hour. The final rate will depend on experience and fit.","compensation":{"compensationTierSummary":null,"scrapeableCompensationSalarySummary":null,"compensationTiers":[],"summaryComponents":[]}}],"apiVersion":"1"}